• Media & Diversity
  • About
    • DONOR TRANSPARENCY POLICY
  • Digital Jobs
    • Aunt Benet’s Career Advice
    • Media Movers
  • Resources
    • Fellowships & Rewards
  • Advertise
    • Rate Card
  • Contact Us

All Digitocracy

Media & Diversity

  • NEWS
  • BUSINESS
  • INTERNATIONAL
  • POLICY
  • AllD TECH
  • PEOPLE
  • ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT

Black Folks went to a movie and no one died! Film at 11…

August 17, 2015 by Denise Clay

This weekend, the movie #StraightOuttaCompton, the biopic that tells the story of seminal rap group N.W.A, broke box office records, earning $56.1 million.

Because police, a group that N.W.A. had a special affinity for, believed that Compton viewers would start a mini-version of the 1992 L.A. Riots, security was increased at local theaters. There were no incidents reported.

For the folks at CNN unfortunately, that appeared to be somewhat of a surprise…and gave us yet another example of why media diversity is important.

11903931_1064008853640079_8795137216759544301_n

While this bit of Chyron Abuse was the most obvious, it wasn’t the only faux pas for TV news networks this weekend. Tech entrepreneur Justin Kan, a partner at the incubator Y Combinator and founder of Kiko, Socialcam, Exec, and co-founder of Twitch was the victim of a hate crime when someone painted racist graffiti on the garage door of his San Francisco home.

When a neighbor painted over the slur with the wrong color paint, and a local television station managed to spell his last name—a name consisting of only three letters–incorrectly, Kan joked on Facebook that he’d become the “victim of a hate crime, a help crime, and now a name crime.”

As journalists we have to make sure that factual errors like misspelled names and chyron fails that express surprise that people of color can go to a movie without a riot breaking out don’t find their way into our work. All of the hard work that we’ve done as journalists to gain credibility with readers and viewers can be wiped out.

It might be time for television stations to start rehiring some of the copy editors laid off by newspapers to double check the work.

It might also be time for news directors to remember what the word “assume” does to everyone involved…

Editor’s note: What are the benefits of subscribing to our weekly newsletter? You’ll get a summary of our top stories of the week, along with exclusive content. The newsletter comes out every Saturday morning, so click here to subscribe today!

© 2015 BD Portraits -  ://BDPortraits.com/Denise Clay is the assistant editor for AllDigitocracy. She is a contributing editor and columnist to the Philadelphia Sunday Sun, and the Philadelphia Public Record. Her work has also appeared on XOJane, and Time.com.

 

Filed Under: Featured, JOURNALISM, NEWS Tagged With: #StraightOuttaCompton, buzzfeed, CNN, journalism fail, Justin Kan, media diversity

Vanity Fair poll, Indian Country Today headline make light of slavery, treatment of American Indians

August 7, 2014 by Tracie Powell

This post has been updated to say Indian Country Today has removed controversial content from its website. Update #2: Statement from Vanity Fair.

Which is worse, Vanity Fair for running the original poll or Indian Country Today for repeating it?

Which is worse, Vanity Fair for running the original poll or Indian Country Today for repeating it?

Vanity Fair, in partnership with 60 Minutes, ran a series of polls over the weekend designed to measure readers’ moral values. One of the polls asked readers about the “biggest ethical misjudgment in US history.” The poll offered several options from which to choose, including slavery, wars and the treatment of Native Americans. Slavery received a plurality of the votes, with treatment of Native Americans coming in second. The results led Indian Country Today Media Network to post its own poll question on Monday: “Rate That Genocide: Which Was Worse, Slavery or Treatment of Native Americans?“

The provocative headline drew immediate outcry from at least one journalism association, but perhaps not the one many would expect: The Native American Journalism Association (NAJA), the smallest of the four associations for journalists of color, wrote a four-page letter taking Indian Country Today to task for being “irresponsible,” “divisive,” and bating people in order to drive up traffic on its website. NAJA is demanding Indian Country Today apologize for what it calls a “lack of news judgement” and lapse in journalistic ethic.

“Genocide is real and should never be compared or rated with other crimes against humanity. It should never be used to stir attention or generate social-media shares,” states the letter, which was sent to Indian Country Today’s publisher Ray Halbritter and creative director Chris Napolitano.

“At worst, your staff failed to understand the seriousness of the subject matter and used the unsettling headline to bate people to your site and drive up ICTMN Web traffic before directing them to vanityfair.com,” the letter continues. “At best, your staff wanted to highlight the unfortunate Vanity Fair/60 Minutes poll that asked people to choose from slavery, the treatment of Native Americans, the Vietnam War, Iraq War and the bombing of Hiroshima in ranking… But even in a best-case scenario, ICTMN’s efforts would have fallen short of adding to the post valuable thought-driven context, a central part of our jobs as journalists. And even in a best-case scenario, there is no defense for the headline.”

Not only does the Vanity Fair/60 Minutes poll as well as the brief in Indian Country Today make the mistake of minimizing acts of terror sustained by Africans and Indigenous people in this country, they also — albeit perhaps unintentionally — pit disadvantaged groups against each other.

When it comes to these types of journalistic “misjudgments” by mainstream media outlets, the ethnic press traditionally served as a counter-balancing voice of reason, bringing clarity and reasoned perspective to volatile issues regarding race and injustices faced by minority communities. But in the digital era, where Buzzfeed is king, some ethnic publications and journalists of color are facing unprecedented pressures to be more provocative, exciting and inciting. We saw it more than a month ago in Madame Noire’s and Naturally Moi’s clumsy coverage of R. Kelly’s transgender child. We saw it a week ago in ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith’s convoluted commentary about domestic violence. And we see it now with Indian Country Today’s awkward response to a poll that had already made light of two of the ugliest phases in American history.

ESPN's Stephen A. Smith was suspended for a week after making controversial comments about women and domestic violence.

ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith was suspended for a week after making controversial comments about women and domestic violence.

A few days ago William C. Rhoden explored the problematic trend in media of how the line between being thought-provoking and merely provoking has become blurred and how thoughtful discourse has been compromised. “… fitting nuanced points into three- to five-second sound bites is like trying to fire a pass through three defenders in airtight coverage,” Rhoden writes in the Sunday New York Times. So too is squeezing the horrors and complexities of slavery and Native American genocide into the space of a poll question.

“The poll is about ethics, or the lack of them,” said Beth Kseniak, Vanity Fair’s executive director of public relations. “When we asked the question about the biggest ethical misjudgment in U.S. History, we were simply curious about how Americans view their past.”

While Vanity Fair apparently still doesn’t get that its poll is offensive, Indian Country Today removed the content in question from its website late Tuesday afternoon after receiving the letter from the Native American Journalists Association. Napolitano, Indian Country Today’s creative director, emailed me saying editors found the Vanity Fair/60 Minutes poll to be problematic and wanted to expose the offensive premise behind it in an absurd way.

Chris Napolitano, Creative Director, Indian Country Today.

Chris Napolitano, Creative Director, Indian Country Today.

“But intent is useless if the execution is shoddy. And clearly it was,” writes Napolitano in his email. “The headline had an element of satire to it but didn’t name the target of the satire. The body text of the article was not satirical at all. The graphic from the Vanity Fair site, presented at face value, only muddled things further. Our piece ended up offending readers in the same way the Vanity Fair piece had offended us. To those readers who were troubled by the headline and article, we say: We’re sorry.”

Based on introductory paragraphs in the Vanity Fair piece, their intention was/is to spur readers to examine themselves and their own awareness of the differences between right and wrong.  Unfortunately the magazine’s editors responsible for this lapse in judgment failed, and should probably examine their own awareness.

Now that Indian Country Today has apologized, NAJA leaders say they will turn their attention to Vanity Fair, which they called “misguided.”

Whatever Vanity Fair chooses to do, Rhoden astutely points out in his New York Times column that when it comes to being provocative in this manner, Buzzfeed is a master. Wannabes like Indian Country Today and Vanity Fair “just wind up being picked off or fired.” That’s especially true for media organizations in a country getting browner by the day.

Filed Under: Featured, JOURNALISM, Magazines, NEWS, Online Tagged With: 60 Minutes, accountability, buzzfeed, genocide, Indian Country Today, journalism fail, NAJA, Native American Journalists Association, polls, satire, slavery, Stephen A. Smith, Vanity Fair

Follow @allDigitocracy
allDigitocracy
allDigitocracy @allDigitocracy

Join me for this event: The Financial Future of Local News #trustinnews https://t.co/8ax0gMuU0Q.
View on Twitter
0
0
allDigitocracy
allDigitocracy @allDigitocracy

Starting with its November issue, @NatGeo is launching a year of celebrating the power of women’s voices and how they’re changing the world. https://t.co/tJzTlTNeZ8
View on Twitter
allDigitocracy photo
2
1
allDigitocracy
allDigitocracy @allDigitocracy

After months of financial struggle, Howard's student newspaper is considering going online-only.
https://t.co/IVfz2khAIY
View on Twitter
0
0
allDigitocracy
allDigitocracy @allDigitocracy

Missed yesterday's webinar on the new Racial Equity in Journalism Fund? Watch it now and then apply! https://t.co/HiAJSXij7L
View on Twitter
1
0
allDigitocracy
allDigitocracy @allDigitocracy

Botham Jean, Amber Guyger and the urgent case for unconscious bias training... https://t.co/Tnob4G2uEp on @bloglovin
View on Twitter
0
0
allDigitocracy
allDigitocracy @allDigitocracy

#BothamJean, #AmberGuyger and the case for unconscious bias training in U.S. newsrooms. https://t.co/yaOvnTWDni https://t.co/Zgp3cUFtVX
View on Twitter
allDigitocracy photo
1
0

Copyright © 2019 · allDigitocracy on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in